In a recent case NCAT upheld a general meeting special resolution of an owners corporation that approved the installation of new rain water tanks in a strata scheme, despite there being:

• technical non-compliance with the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (SSMA) in the notice convening the general meeting
• an argument by a lot owner that the placement of the new rain water tanks near her lot devalued the lot

So, was the decision a victory for common sense?  Tribunal Upholds Validity of General Meeting

For NSW strata legal or levy collection advice please contact us here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.

NCAT was recently presented with a unique insurance problem concerning the insurance policies for a strata scheme in the snowy mountains region of NSW.

The strata scheme contains 100 lots and common property with free standing houses and outbuildings that are situated on acreages.

The common property also includes a free standing community hall, roads and paddocks occupying 806 acres of rural land.

Confronting the owners corporation for many years was a unique insurance problem. The strata legislation required the owners corporation to insure all of the buildings in the strata scheme, even the homes and outbuildings that were situated entirely on the lots and did not contain any common property.

How did NCAT resolve this unique Insurance Problem?

For NSW strata legal or levy collection advice please contact us here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.

NCAT has recently changed the rules that apply to expert evidence in most strata cases.

These changes relax the rules relating to expert evidence and make it easier for opinions to be given by experts in a quicker and cheaper way.

Previously, if a person such as a building consultant, engineer or valuer, wanted to give expert evidence in a strata dispute in NCAT, they had to comply with certain rules before their evidence would be accepted.

These included rules that required the person to follow an Expert Witness Code of Conduct to ensure that they act as an independent expert and not as the “hired gun” of one of the parties.

Often, an expert’s report would be rejected by NCAT if those rules were not followed.

However, those rules no longer apply to most strata disputes. This means that experts will now be able to give evidence in most strata cases in NCAT without having to comply with every aspect of the Expert Witness Code of Conduct.

This is intended to ensure that opinions for strata disputes, given by experts, are able to be obtained in an easier and cheaper way although those opinions will still need to be soundly based and reliable.

So, what are the new rules for giving expert evidence? NCAT Changes the Rules for Strata Disputes.

For NSW strata legal or levy collection advice contact us here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.

Did you know a person involved in a strata dispute in NCAT must get permission from NCAT to be represented by a strata lawyer?

Under the previous legislation, legal representation at NCAT was allowed. However, all of that changed with the introduction in 2014 of the NCAT and in 2016 the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015.

This has created problems and questions for many owners corporations which require legal representation in NCAT such as:

• When and will NCAT grant permission for a party to be represented by a lawyer?
• What happens if NCAT refuses to allow a strata lawyer to represent an owners corporation – who will present the owners corporation’s case?
• Can the strata lawyer still help if they cannot provide representation at NCAT?

So, what role can a strata lawyer for an owners corporation play when NCAT does not allow the lawyer to represent the owners corporation?  What is The Right to Strata Legal Representation in NCAT?

For NSW strata legal or levy collection advice contact us here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.

The Supreme Court recently ordered a lot owner who succeeded in litigation against an owners corporation to pay the owners corporation’s legal costs.

This is one of the first times a litigant has been punished by an adverse costs order for approaching the Supreme Court for relief which could have been given by NCAT.

We recently wrote about this case and the decision of the Supreme Court. The Court decided that an owners corporation of an apartment building in inner Sydney could not upgrade or build on common property in a way that would prevent a lot owner gaining access to, and egress from, a car space lot with a regular sized car.

So, what was the outcome after the Court handed down its judgment? Why did the Court decide that the lot owner should pay the litigation costs?

Read the full details here Supreme Court Orders Winner to Pay Legal Costs.

For NSW strata legal or levy collection advice contact us here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.

After four sets of legal proceedings, the Supreme Court has finally given the green light for a lot owner to keep his outdoor spa and decking installed on an external area in a lot in a residential strata scheme.

This case highlights the restrictions that apply to appeals to the Supreme Court against decisions made by NCAT in strata disputes and the difficulty winning those appeals.

Read the full case here; After 4 Years, Mr Nicholls Gets to Keep His Spa

For NSW strata legal or levy collection advice please contact us here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.

For NSW strata legal or levy collection advice please contact us here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.

In a landmark ruling, NCAT has ordered an owners corporation to pay compensation to an owner for water damage to the owner’s unit caused by defects in the common property.

This ruling indicates that NCAT is able to resolve strata disputes by making compensation orders.

But has NCAT got it wrong? Read on to find out: NCAT Orders Owners Corporation to Pay Compensation

For NSW strata legal or levy collection advice please contact us here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.

In a recent case, NCAT ruled against a short term letting by-law being passed for a Sydney apartment block.

So, was NCAT’s decision wrong?

Can an owners corporation pass a by-law that bans short term letting?

Read on to find out: NCAT Rules Against Short Term Letting By-law

For strata legal or levy collection advice please contact us here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.

In a recent decision, NCAT has confirmed that it is business as usual and that appeals against decisions of Strata Adjudicators will continue to be dealt with by NCAT in the same manner, even though strata adjudications have been abolished under the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015.

Introduction

The Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 (old Act) allowed Strata Adjudicators to make orders to resolve strata disputes. On 30 November 2016, the old Act was repealed and replaced by the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (new Act).  The new Act abolished strata adjudications.

However, there were still strata adjudications pending at the time the old Act was repealed and decisions of Strata Adjudicators under the old Act continued to be made up until recently. This created uncertainty as to whether or not a party dissatisfied with a decision made by an Adjudicator could appeal against the decision after 30 November 2016.

To read the full article – NCAT Clarifies Appeal Rights Against Decisions of Strata Adjudicators

For NSW strata legal or levy collection advice please contact us here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.